W-303B-11
Bottom-up Control: Spatial Overlap of Predator and Prey Explains Recruitment Variability of Juvenile Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus)

Wednesday, August 20, 2014: 1:30 PM
303B (Centre des congrès de Québec // Québec City Convention Centre)
Elizabeth Siddon , NOAA/National Research Council, Juneau, AK
Trond Kristiansen , Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway
Franz J. Mueter , University of Alaska Fairbanks, Auke Bay, AK
Kirstin Holsman , Afsc / Safs, NOAA Fisheries / University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Ron Heintz , Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Juneau, AK
Ed Farley Jr. , Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratories, NOAA Fisheries, Juneau, AK
Variability in walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) growth and survival is structured in part by climate-driven bottom-up control of zooplankton composition. We used two modeling approaches to understand the roles of prey quality, prey composition, and water temperature on juvenile walleye pollock growth: (1) a bioenergetics model that included local predator and prey energy densities, and (2) an individual-based model that included a mechanistic feeding component, local prey densities and size, and physical oceanographic conditions. Prey composition in late-summer shifted from predominantly smaller copepod species in the warmer 2005 season to larger species in the cooler 2010 season, reflecting differences in zooplankton composition between years. Spatial patterns in prey composition and water temperature lead to areas of enhanced growth, or growth ‘hot spots’, for juvenile walleye pollock and survival may be enhanced when fish overlap with these areas. This study provides evidence that a spatial mismatch between juvenile walleye pollock and growth ‘hot spots’ in 2005 contributed to poor recruitment while a higher degree of overlap in 2010 resulted in improved recruitment. Our results indicate that climate-driven changes in prey quality and composition can impact growth of juvenile walleye pollock, potentially severely affecting recruitment variability.