T-205C-1
The Lake Superior Biomass Size-Spectrum

Tuesday, August 19, 2014: 8:20 AM
205C (Centre des congrès de Québec // Québec City Convention Centre)
Peder Yurista , Midcontinent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN
Daniel L. Yule , Lake Superior Biological Station, USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Ashland, WI
Matthew P. Balge , Normandeau Associates, Inc., Portsmouth, NH
Jon VanAlstine , Superior National Forest, US Forest Service, Duluth, MN
Jo Thompson , Midcontinent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN
Allison Gamble , Waterville Area Fisheries Office, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Waterville, MN
Thomas R. Hrabik , Department of Biology, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Duluth, MN
John R Kelly , Mid-Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN
Jason Stockwell , Rubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Mark R. Vinson , Lake Superior Biological Station, U.S. Geological Survey, Ashland, WI
We combined data from multiple sampling programs to describe the Lake Superior pelagic biomass size structure.  The data represented phytoplankton, zooplankton and prey-fish that spanned over 10 orders of magnitude in size and two time periods separated by five years.  The biomass size-spectrum was stable over the 5-year time frame.  The primary scaling or overall slope of the normalized biomass size-spectra (NBSS) for the combined years was -1.113.  The slope was consistent with a previous estimate for Lake Superior (-1.10) that was based on phytoplankton and zooplankton (Sprules and Munawar 1986).  Periodic dome structures within the overall biomass size-spectrum were fit to polynomial regressions.  The regressions described observed sub-domes that occurred within the classical taxonomic positions (algae, zooplankton, and fish).  This more restricted interpretation of periodic dome structure was aligned more closely with predator-prey size relationships that existed within the zooplankton (herbivorous, predacious) and fish (planktivorous, piscivorous) taxonomic positions.  Domes were spaced approximately every 3.78 Log10 units along the axis and with a decreasing peak magnitude of -4.1 Log10 units.  The relative position of the algal and herbivorous zooplankton domes predicted well the subsequent biomass domes for larger predatory zooplankton and planktivorous prey fish.