W-200B-3
Diversity in a Multi-Stock System: Temporal and Spatial Portfolio Effects in Lake Erie Walleye Production

Wednesday, August 20, 2014: 10:50 AM
200B (Centre des congrès de Québec // Québec City Convention Centre)
Mark DuFour , University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Jeremy Pritt , USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Ann Arbor, MI
Christine M. Mayer , Environmental Sciences and the Lake Erie Center, University of Toledo, Oregon, OH
Cassandra May , Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Stuart A. Ludsin , Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Elizabeth A. Marschall , Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Mike Fraker , Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Edward F. Roseman , USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Ann Arbor, MI
Jeffrey G. Miner , Biology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH
Jeremiah Davis , Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH
Christopher S. Vandergoot , Division of Wildlife, Sandusky Fisheries Research Station, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Sandusky, OH
Jeff Tyson , Division of Wildlife, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Sandusky, OH
Geographically distinct spawning stocks can generate population stability by increasing resiliency to environmental change. Stocks are likely to respond differently to environmental change due to variation in habitat-specific responses. The differential response among stocks may generate a “portfolio effect” by maximizing the ratio of spawning production to risk (i.e. poor production) through diversification. We compared larval walleye (Sander vitreus) production from three tributaries (Detroit, Maumee, and Sandusky Rivers) and the open-lake reef complex of western Lake Erie over several years (1994, 1995, 2011-2013). The reefs produced more larval walleye than all tributaries combined, but reef production was highly variable. In years when reef production was low, river production made substantial contributions, partially buffering reduced contribution from the reefs. The Detroit and Maumee Rivers produced relatively consistent numbers of larval walleye, whereas production from the Sandusky was more variable. Reef and river stocks responded differently to changing environmental conditions and climate, indicating that production risk is diversifiable.  Appropriate investments, such as stock-specific management and protection and restoration of in-river habitat may decrease variation in inter-annual production of larval walleye.